Recommendations and expert opinion on the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in Spain.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard in the management of patients with localised colon cancer (CC) following curative resection. The use of oxaliplatin plus 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine-based (XELOX) regimens, both approved in Europe as adjuvant treatment for stage III CC, has improved prognosis in this stage, but questions on their usefulness in high-risk stage II or elderly CC patients and on the role of some prognostic biomarkers are still pending. In April 2010, a consensus meeting on adjuvant CC treatment based on a revision of the most recent literature was held in Spain. The panel considered the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II CC patients to be justified. Additionally, the more convenient administration of oral fluoropyrimidines vs. IV continuous infusion 5-FU would make XELOX a more suitable alternative for the patient. A more cautious decision should be taken when prescribing oxaliplatin treatment in patients aged ≥70.

Recommendations and expert opinion on the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in Spain

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard in the management of patients with localised colon cancer (CC) following curative resection. The use of oxaliplatin plus 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine-based (XELOX) regimens, both approved in Europe as adjuvant treatment for stage III CC, has improved prognosis in this stage, but questions on their usefulness in high-risk stage II or elderly CC patients and on the role of some prognostic biomarkers are still pending. In April 2010, a consensus meeting on adjuvant CC treatment based on a revision of the most recent literature was held in Spain. The panel considered the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II CC patients to be justified. Additionally, the more convenient administration of oral fluoropyrimidines vs. IV continuous infusion 5-FU would make XELOX a more suitable alternative for the patient. A more cautious decision should be taken when prescribing oxaliplatin treatment in patients aged ≥70 (AU)

A novel biweekly schedule with cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A new schedule with cisplatin and gemcitabine administered biweekly was prospectively evaluated in stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer. We report the interim analysis of the safety and efficacy with the first 23 patients included. The mean age was 60. Thirteen patients (56.5%) were stage IIIB and 10 (43.5%) were stage IV The overall response rate was 47.8%: 69.2% for stage IIIB and 20% for stage IV The median survival among the 23 patients was 33 weeks and 1-year survival was 39%: 53.8% for stage IIIB and 20% for stage IV Seventy-seven cycles (154 administrations) were given. The mean number of cycles/patient was 3.3 (range: 1 to 6). Of the 154 administrations, 26 were delayed 1 week for recovery from toxicity. The dose intensity (Hryniuk criteria) was 94% of the planned dose. There was one toxic death with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 esophagitis. In two patients, grade 3-4 vascular toxicity was observed, with distal arterial ischemic changes in the lower extremities. There were three (3.9%) episodes of grade 2 neutropenia, one (1.7%) of grade 3 and another one of grade 4. No cases of febrile neutropenia were seen. Predominant nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia and nausea/vomiting. This schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine has a good therapeutic index and, as it is active, enrollment is ongoing to complete the second part of the study.